<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How bloggers are handling the new FTC affiliate disclosure rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marktzk.com/how-bloggers-are-handling-ftc-affiliate-disclosure-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marktzk.com/how-bloggers-are-handling-ftc-affiliate-disclosure-rules/</link>
	<description>Handcrafted advice and ideas on social media, online marketing and business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 07:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Tosczak</title>
		<link>http://marktzk.com/how-bloggers-are-handling-ftc-affiliate-disclosure-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Tosczak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marktzk.com/?p=340#comment-468</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s hope it doesn&#039;t come to that. I thought your disclosure was pretty clear, but then, I&#039;m obviously not a government lawyer. It would be nice if they were a bit clearer when making these rules ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s hope it doesn&#8217;t come to that. I thought your disclosure was pretty clear, but then, I&#8217;m obviously not a government lawyer. It would be nice if they were a bit clearer when making these rules &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Hanagarne</title>
		<link>http://marktzk.com/how-bloggers-are-handling-ftc-affiliate-disclosure-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Hanagarne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marktzk.com/?p=340#comment-467</guid>
		<description>Mark, I have no idea if my attempt at this will be sufficient or not.  I guess we&#039;ll know if the knock on the door comes and I&#039;m beaten with rods by the FTC.  That&#039;s them there guys, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, I have no idea if my attempt at this will be sufficient or not.  I guess we&#8217;ll know if the knock on the door comes and I&#8217;m beaten with rods by the FTC.  That&#8217;s them there guys, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://marktzk.com/how-bloggers-are-handling-ftc-affiliate-disclosure-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marktzk.com/?p=340#comment-463</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by GadoWager: http://is.gd/6JSeg How bloggers are handling the new FTC affiliate disclosure rules...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by GadoWager: <a href="http://is.gd/6JSeg" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/6JSeg</a> How bloggers are handling the new FTC affiliate disclosure rules&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Tosczak</title>
		<link>http://marktzk.com/how-bloggers-are-handling-ftc-affiliate-disclosure-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Tosczak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marktzk.com/?p=340#comment-461</guid>
		<description>Thanks Kimberly. It&#039;s good to hear that a lawyer like yourself agrees with my basic assessment that we don&#039;t yet exactly what the disclosure needs to look like. But, you&#039;re of course right - any disclosure is better than no disclosure. I&#039;m also glad that you and other lawyers are writing about this issue and helping the rest of us non-legal types understand it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kimberly. It&#8217;s good to hear that a lawyer like yourself agrees with my basic assessment that we don&#8217;t yet exactly what the disclosure needs to look like. But, you&#8217;re of course right &#8211; any disclosure is better than no disclosure. I&#8217;m also glad that you and other lawyers are writing about this issue and helping the rest of us non-legal types understand it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimberly Houser</title>
		<link>http://marktzk.com/how-bloggers-are-handling-ftc-affiliate-disclosure-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Houser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marktzk.com/?p=340#comment-454</guid>
		<description>You are right.  We really do not know exactly what language the FTC will find sufficient.  It will take a few enforcement actions to get a good feel for it.  In the meantime, it would seem that any disclosure is better than no disclosure.  I recently discussed the FTC Guide on my legal blog - In the Eyes of the Law at www.kimberlyhouser.wordpress.com.  Your blog is very informative and gave me some great ideas on future posts.  Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right.  We really do not know exactly what language the FTC will find sufficient.  It will take a few enforcement actions to get a good feel for it.  In the meantime, it would seem that any disclosure is better than no disclosure.  I recently discussed the FTC Guide on my legal blog &#8211; In the Eyes of the Law at <a href="http://www.kimberlyhouser.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.kimberlyhouser.wordpress.com</a>.  Your blog is very informative and gave me some great ideas on future posts.  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
